+<!--
+$Id$
+
+$Log$
+Revision 1.3 2005/04/02 19:28:22 angantyr
+Updated with implemented/commented/new issues in conjunction with new book
+upload.
+
+-->
+
<html>
<head>
<title>War of the Wizards: Corrections</title>
<div class="section"><a name="toc">toc</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="title">title</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="title.htm">Title Page</a> #1: THE WORLD OF LONE WOLF -> <cite>The World of Lone Wolf</cite><div class="cm jb">Make that <cite></div><div class="cm tw">ok!</div></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="title.htm">Title Page</a> #2: tumultuous climax to your epic struggle to overthrow -> tumultuous climax of your epic struggle to overthrow <div class="cm jp">Flows better. Please tell me if this is an innapropriate type of change.</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="title.htm">Title Page</a> #2: tumultuous climax to your epic struggle to overthrow -> tumultuous climax of your epic struggle to overthrow <div class="cm jp">Flows better. Please tell me if this is an innapropriate type of change.</div><div class="cm jb">approved</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="dedicate">dedicate</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="acknwldg">acknwldg</a></div>
<div class="cn"><a href="acknwldg.htm">Acknowledgements</a> #1: frontmatter -> front matter <div class="cm ik">as in gs01, gs03, lw05, lw06, lw08-lw12</div></div>
<div class="cn"><a href="tssf.htm">The Story So Far . . .</a> #1: Kleasa -> Kleasá <div class="cm ik">7x</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="gamerulz">gamerulz</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #1: Remove " at the front of this book"</div>
-<div class="f"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #2: For WILLPOWER, add the standard footnote about going below 0 points. <div class="cm tw">This is the standard footnote: "It is possible for your WILLPOWER to fall below zero. For example, if you are the victim of an attack that drains your WILLPOWER, your score may be forced below zero. If your WILLPOWER falls to zero or below, you will not be able to cast spells or use your Wizard's Staff until your score is again above zero."</div><div class="cm jb">I was thinking, we may want to add some instructions about how to treat the Wizard's Staff in combat if your WP is at 0 or below, namely a normal non-magical weapon that has the normal penalty for not using the Wizard's Staff.</div><div class="cm tw">I am not sure of the Staff can be used as a normal weapon? But OK, it does say it looks like a normal quarterstaff and is stronger than all known metals, so I guess it should do. Change then "use your Wizard's Staff" -> "use the magical properties of your Wizard's Staff" and and add "You can still use your Wizard's Staff in combat as a normal weapon, but you must deduct 6 points from your COMBAT SKILL." either to this footnote or as a new footnote in Magical Powers, Wizard's Staff?</div></div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #2: For WILLPOWER, add the standard footnote about going below 0 points. <div class="cm tw">This is the standard footnote: "It is possible for your WILLPOWER to fall below zero. For example, if you are the victim of an attack that drains your WILLPOWER, your score may be forced below zero. If your WILLPOWER falls to zero or below, you will not be able to cast spells or use your Wizard's Staff until your score is again above zero."</div><div class="cm jb">I was thinking, we may want to add some instructions about how to treat the Wizard's Staff in combat if your WP is at 0 or below, namely a normal non-magical weapon that has the normal penalty for not using the Wizard's Staff.</div><div class="cm tw">I am not sure of the Staff can be used as a normal weapon? But OK, it does say it looks like a normal quarterstaff and is stronger than all known metals, so I guess it should do. Change then "use your Wizard's Staff" -> "use the magical properties of your Wizard's Staff" and and add "You can still use your Wizard's Staff in combat as a normal weapon, but you must deduct 6 points from your COMBAT SKILL." either to this footnote or as a new footnote in Magical Powers, Wizard's Staff?</div><div class="cm jb">I would add it to the same footnote, but link to the footnote in both places.</div><div class="cm tw">It's in two different sections, so it cannot be the same footnote... unless... no, won't work. So duplicated footnote then.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #3: Remove "If you run out of space, you can copy out the chart or have it photocopied."</div>
<div class="ce"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #4: Remove " on the last page of this book"</div>
-<div class="
cf"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #5: What happens to an existing CS score? Footnote similar to in 03btng (but note that WP and EP are covered already): "This section of the rules implies that you must re-pick your COMBAT SKILL even though you may have already completed a previous adventure. This is without precedent in other books and therefore appears to be a mistake. In order to preserve rule consistency among the books, you may choose to retain your COMBAT SKILL score."</div>
-<div class="f"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #6: Endurance Points paragraph <div class="cm dd">Argh! Again, the sentance "Add *any* ENDURANCE points gained from playing previous Grey Star *adventures* {plural} to your initial score of 30..." is rather problematic. I can't possibly see how it would make sense to add EPs from all three of the previous Grey Star books! Surely it must mean the *last* successfully completed book? (So why use the phrasing as printed, then?). Also, it's standard practice in the Lone Wolf rules to restore your EPs to their original total when carrying them over (Dever explicitly endorses this in a Lone Wolf Club Newsletter) ... but I would hazard a guess that this isn't intended here. (Although the phrase "...points GAINED from playing previous...adventures" certainly doesn't clarify this - the phrase "left over from" would surely be the intended meaning?) ... Adding your restored EP total would just be too much of a bonus, I feel, and spoil gameplay. Hows about the following footnote: "The most likely interpretation of the rules here is that the player can take their final ENDURANCE points total from the end of their last successfully completed Grey Star adventure, and add 30 to this figure. Note that in the rules for the Lone Wolf books, it is standard practice to restore one's ENDURANCE points to their original total when carrying them across from one adventure to the next, but this does not appear to be appropriate here in this scenario with the Moonstone."</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #7: Willpower paragraph <div class="cm dd">I find the sentence "If you possess unused WILLPOWER points from earlier Grey Star adventures, add them to the 50 WILLPOWER points which possession of the the Moonstone grants you" a bit problematic - it clearly says "adventures", plural - but surely it can only mean the *last* adventure you successfully completed? And of course, there's the whole "what WP score do I actually use - your initial total? the score you had at the end of the book?........... on balance, I'd suggest the following footnote: "The most likely interpretation of the rules here is that the player can take their final WILLPOWER total from the end of their last successfully completed Grey Star adventure, and add 50 to this figure."</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #8: Combat Skill paragraph <div class="cm dd">Proposed footnote: "This implies that you must pick a new COMBAT SKILL from the Random Number Table even if have already completed previous Grey Star adventure(s). This conflicts with the rules for the Lone Wolf books, where you can carry over your score from a successfully completed previous adventure. For the sake of consistency, players may wish to carry over their existing CS score from the last Grey Star book they completed."</div></div>
+<div class="
rf"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #5: What happens to an existing CS score? Footnote similar to in 03btng (but note that WP and EP are covered already): "This section of the rules implies that you must re-pick your COMBAT SKILL even though you may have already completed a previous adventure. This is without precedent in other books and therefore appears to be a mistake. In order to preserve rule consistency among the books, you may choose to retain your COMBAT SKILL score."</div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #6: Endurance Points paragraph <div class="cm dd">Argh! Again, the sentance "Add *any* ENDURANCE points gained from playing previous Grey Star *adventures* {plural} to your initial score of 30..." is rather problematic. I can't possibly see how it would make sense to add EPs from all three of the previous Grey Star books! Surely it must mean the *last* successfully completed book? (So why use the phrasing as printed, then?). Also, it's standard practice in the Lone Wolf rules to restore your EPs to their original total when carrying them over (Dever explicitly endorses this in a Lone Wolf Club Newsletter) ... but I would hazard a guess that this isn't intended here. (Although the phrase "...points GAINED from playing previous...adventures" certainly doesn't clarify this - the phrase "left over from" would surely be the intended meaning?) ... Adding your restored EP total would just be too much of a bonus, I feel, and spoil gameplay. Hows about the following footnote: "The most likely interpretation of the rules here is that the player can take their final ENDURANCE points total from the end of their last successfully completed Grey Star adventure, and add 30 to this figure. Note that in the rules for the Lone Wolf books, it is standard practice to restore one's ENDURANCE points to their original total when carrying them across from one adventure to the next, but this does not appear to be appropriate here in this scenario with the Moonstone."</div><div class="cm jb">The original intent of the author was most likely that the player should add 30 to their final ENDURANCE score from the end of their last successfully completed <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> adventure. In the <cite>Lone Wolf</cite> series, it is standard practice to restore one's ENDURANCE points to their original total when carrying them over from one adventure to the next, but the power of the Moonstone seems to change those rules in this case.</div><div class="cm tw">Using GS instead of WoLW in Jon's version.</div></div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #7: Willpower paragraph <div class="cm dd">I find the sentence "If you possess unused WILLPOWER points from earlier Grey Star adventures, add them to the 50 WILLPOWER points which possession of the the Moonstone grants you" a bit problematic - it clearly says "adventures", plural - but surely it can only mean the *last* adventure you successfully completed? And of course, there's the whole "what WP score do I actually use - your initial total? the score you had at the end of the book?........... on balance, I'd suggest the following footnote: "The most likely interpretation of the rules here is that the player can take their final WILLPOWER total from the end of their last successfully completed Grey Star adventure, and add 50 to this figure."</div><div class="cm jb">The original intent of the author was most likely that the player should add 50 to their final WILLPOWER score from the end of their last successfully completed <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> adventure.</div><div class="cm tw">Using GS instead of WoLW in Jon's version.</div></div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="gamerulz.htm">The Game Rules</a> #8: Combat Skill paragraph <div class="cm dd">Proposed footnote: "This implies that you must pick a new COMBAT SKILL from the Random Number Table even if have already completed previous Grey Star adventure(s). This conflicts with the rules for the Lone Wolf books, where you can carry over your score from a successfully completed previous adventure. For the sake of consistency, players may wish to carry over their existing CS score from the last Grey Star book they completed."</div><div class="cm jb">It is implied that you must pick a new COMBAT SKILL from the Random Number Table even if have already completed previous one or more <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> adventures. This conflicts with the rules for the <cite>Lone Wolf</cite> books where you carry over your score from a previous successfully completed adventure. For the sake of consistency, players may wish to carry over their existing score from the last <cite>World of Lone Wolf</cite> book they completed.</div><div class="cm tw">Using GS instead of WoLW in Jon's version.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="discplnz">discplnz</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="powers">powers</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="powers.htm">Magical Powers</a> #1: physiurgy -> Physiurgy</div>
<div class="ce"><a href="powers.htm">Magical Powers</a> #15: alchemy -> Alchemy<div class="cm so">Errata</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="powers.htm">Magical Powers</a> #16: divination -> Prophecy<div class="cm so">Errata</div></div>
<div class="cf"><a href="powers.htm">Magical Powers</a> #17: Add a footnote about choosing Powers similar to in 03btng: "The wording of this section of the rules seems to indicate--if read literally--that you may choose your set of Lesser Magicks again if you have completed a previous adventure. This is without precedent in other books. In order to preserve consistency with other books, you should not choose your Lesser Magicks again. If you have currently mastered five Lesser Magicks, you may choose one additional Lesser Magick from the list. If you have already mastered six Lesser Magicks, you keep these. If you choose Alchemy as a new Lesser Magick, or you have not mastered the Lesser Magick of Alchemy but you have selected the Higher Magick of Theurgy, you also receive a Herb Pouch with contents, as detailed in the Equipment section." <div class="cm tw">damn, this got a bit longwinded.</div><div class="cm jb">For the footnote, change "currently master" to "have currently mastered", "already master" to "have already mastered", and "do not master" to "have not mastered".</div><div class="cm tw">OK fixed above.</div></div>
+<div class="u"><a href="powers.htm">Magical Powers</a> #18: COMBAT SKILL If -> COMBAT SKILL. If</div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="powers.htm">Magical Powers</a> #19: If your WILLPOWER falls to zero or below, you will not be able to use the magical properties of your Wizard's Staff until your score is again above zero. You can still use your Wizard's Staff in combat as a normal weapon, but you must deduct 6 points from your COMBAT SKILL. <div class="cm tw">A cut-down version of the footnote from Game Rules.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="equipmnt">equipmnt</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="equipmnt.htm">Equipment</a> #1: Add "Mark these 4 items in your Action Chart." below the Alchemny equipment list. <div class="cm tw">add to Errata!</div><div class="cm tw">Done!</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="equipmnt.htm">Equipment</a> #2: Remove " at the beginning of this book".</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect12">sect12</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #1: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #2: Dimension door -> Dimension Door</div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #3: The wordings of the 1st and 3rd choices are confusing I think. The 1st sounds like you have to use Thaumaturgy if you can, but of course you'd rather use a Temeris potion and save some WP. Therefore I propose that we: 1) move the second choice to the first position, and 2) (see the next errata entry).</div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #4: If you are using -> Otherwise, you may use <div class="cm tw">This abuses the sentence structure a bit, but it works, or?</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #3: The wordings of the 1st and 3rd choices are confusing I think. The 1st sounds like you have to use Thaumaturgy if you can, but of course you'd rather use a Temeris potion and save some WP. Therefore I propose that we: 1) move the second choice to the first position, and 2) (see the next errata entry).<div class="cm jb">Moonstone, deduct -> Moonstone, you may deduct</div><div class="cm jb">Thaumaturgy, deduct -> Thaumaturgy, you may deduct</div><div class="cm tw">Keep the same choice order or not?</div></div>
+<div class="re"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #4: If you are using -> Otherwise, you may use <div class="cm tw">This abuses the sentence structure a bit, but it works, or?</div><div class="cm jb">I think the other proposed corrections would make this unnecessary.</div><div class="cm tw">OK, rejected.</div></div>
+<div class="cn"><a href="sect12.htm">12</a> #5: <div class="cm jb">Make the last paragraph a <choice/>.</div><div class="cm tw">Hm I have vague memories we have had this up before, long ago... should all "death sentences" be <choice> encoded?</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect13">sect13</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect14">sect14</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect15">sect15</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect15.htm">15</a> #3: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect15.htm">15</a> #4: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="re"><a href="sect15.htm">15</a> #5: <div class="cm so">Is there a missing link option that should go here? The final link lists 3 Magical Powers you can use, but you are only given the option of two of them. If not, 'Theurgy' should be removed from the final option.</div><div class="cm tw">To reach this section, you have to possess Theurgy, so the first choice implies that you use it. We could perhaps modify the choice text to make it explicit?</div><div class="cm so">Ah, right. Would footnoting this would be best?</div><div class="cm jb">I vote for clarifying footnote.</div><div class="cm tw">OK, but... hm.</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="sect15.htm">15</a> #6: Explain that the first choice means you use Theurgy. <div class="cm tw">I have no creative idea here. Anyone?</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect15.htm">15</a> #6: Explain that the first choice means you use Theurgy. <div class="cm tw">I have no creative idea here. Anyone?</div><div class="cm jb">I would suggest that "wish to ask" should become "wish to use the Power of Theurgy and ask"</div><div class="cm tw">OK, this becomes an erratum.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect16">sect16</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect17">sect17</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect18">sect18</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect24.htm">24</a> #1: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect24.htm">24</a> #2: this power -> this Power<div class="cm so">Errata</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect24.htm">24</a> #3: these powers -> these Powers<div class="cm so">Errata</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="sect24.htm">24</a> #4: <div class="cm jp">Should there be a footnote explaining that only one 3 WP deduction should occur and only if player chooses that option?</div><div class="cm tw">I don't think that's necessary.</div></div>
+<div class="rf"><a href="sect24.htm">24</a> #4: <div class="cm jp">Should there be a footnote explaining that only one 3 WP deduction should occur and only if player chooses that option?</div><div class="cm tw">I don't think that's necessary.</div><div class="cm jb">unnecessary</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect25">sect25</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect25.htm">25</a> #1: <div class="cm so">Remove all occurrences of '1' from the equipment list.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect25.htm">25</a> #2: (1) coil of Rope -> Coil of Rope <div class="cm tw">also</div></div>
<div class="e"><a href="sect25.htm">25</a> #3: Tinder box -> Tinderbox <div class="cm tw">As everywhere else.</div><div class="cm so">This is Errata.</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="sect25.htm">25</a> #4: What about those sheaths? In 02tfc we added this footnote: "If you wish to take the Sheath, record it as a Special Item on your Action Chart."</div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="sect25.htm">25</a> #4: What about those sheaths? In 02tfc we added this footnote: "If you wish to take the Sheath, record it as a Special Item on your Action Chart."<div class="cm jb">Sounds good to me.</div></div>
<div class="e"><a href="sect25.htm">25</a> #5: 1 Torch counts as 1 Backpack Item -> each Torch counts as one Backpack Item</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect26">sect26</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect27">sect27</a></div>
<div class="e"><a href="sect34.htm">34</a> #14: 1 Tinderbox -> Tinderbox</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect35">sect35</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect36">sect36</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect36.htm">36</a> #1: Tanith have -> Tanith has<div class="cm tw">Wait here, neither ... nor can be followed by both singular and plural, right?</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect36.htm">36</a> #1: Tanith have -> Tanith has<div class="cm tw">Wait here, neither ... nor can be followed by both singular and plural, right?</div><div class="cm jb">I recently found out that, formally, "neither" and "either" both take singular verbs. So, formally speaking, this correction should be made.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect37">sect37</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect38">sect38</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect38.htm">38</a> #1: persectuion -> persecution</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect47">sect47</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect47.htm">47</a> #1: by the Agarash's inspired state -> by the Agarashi's inspired state <div class="cm ik">Agarash is a proper noun</div><div class="cm tw">Those with the "inspired state of crazed frenzy" are the (other) demons, not Agarash himself, right? I think this should say something else.</div><div class="cm so">Dever later used the term Agarashi when referring to Agarash's minions; does this turn of phrase appear anywhere else in the book? If not, we could get away with inserting "Agarashi's".</div><div class="cm tw">I was also thinking about that too, but "Agarashi" is not used anywhere else in any of the GS books.</div><div class="cm jb">I vote for changing it to "Agarashi's" and adding an explanatory footnote. Are there any other occurences of this term where this tactic would be helpful?</div><div class="cm tw">OK changed above and new footnote issue added. </div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect47.htm">47</a> #2: half-way -> halfway <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="sect47.htm">47</a> #3: The term <cite>Agarashi</cite> is not used in any other place in the <cite>Worls of Lone Wolf</cite> books, but it is used elsewhere for the monstrous servants of Agarash the Damned. <div class="cm tw">That footnote really sucks. Better ideas anyone?</div><div class="cm so">How about: "The term Agarashi is not found elsewhere in the World of Lone Wolf series. However, in the more recent Lone Wolf books, Dever has used the term to denote any monstrous servant of Agarash the Damned." Still not that great, though.</div></div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="sect47.htm">47</a> #3: The term <cite>Agarashi</cite> is not used in any other place in the <cite>Worls of Lone Wolf</cite> books, but it is used elsewhere for the monstrous servants of Agarash the Damned. <div class="cm tw">That footnote really sucks. Better ideas anyone?</div><div class="cm so">How about: "The term Agarashi is not found elsewhere in the World of Lone Wolf series. However, in the more recent Lone Wolf books, Dever has used the term to denote any monstrous servant of Agarash the Damned." Still not that great, though.</div><div class="cm jb">Although the term <quote>Agarashi</quote> is not used in anywhere else in the <cite>Worlds of Lone Wolf</cite> books, it is used elsewhere as the collective name for the monstrous servants of Agarash the Damned.</div><div class="cm jb">I meant: Although the term <quote>Agarashi</quote> is not used anywhere else in the <cite>Worlds of Lone Wolf</cite> books, it is used in other books as the collective term for the monstrous servants of Agarash the Damned.</div><div class="cm tw">Using GS instead of WoLW in Jon's version.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect48">sect48</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect49">sect49</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect50">sect50</a></div>
<div class="e"><a href="sect58.htm">58</a> #3: Move the 3rd choice up to the 1st position, according to the "qualified before non-qualified" rule.</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect59">sect59</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect60">sect60</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect60.htm">60</a> #1: Tanith have -> Tanith has<div class="cm tw">See sect36 #1!</div></div>
+<div class="
ce"><a href="sect60.htm">60</a> #1: Tanith have -> Tanith has<div class="cm tw">See sect36 #1!</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect61">sect61</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect62">sect62</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect63">sect63</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect86">sect86</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect86.htm">86</a> #1: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect86.htm">86</a> #2: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect86.htm">86</a> #3: This section is missing a choice for what to do if you do not have any of the Magical Powers! However, 280 has one: "If you do not possess any of the above Powers, you must attack the bridge with your Staff; turn to 175."</div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect86.htm">86</a> #3: This section is missing a choice for what to do if you do not have any of the Magical Powers! However, 280 has one: "If you do not possess any of the above Powers, you must attack the bridge with your Staff; turn to 175."<div class="cm jb">I think it's OK to add that choice.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect87">sect87</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect88">sect88</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect89">sect89</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect106">sect106</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect107">sect107</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect108">sect108</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect108.htm">108</a> #1: enchantment -> Enchantment <div class="cm tw">Is it the Power of Enchantment or enchantment in general?</div><div class="cm so">Errata</div><div class="cm jb">I'm not currently somewhere where I can view the graph to check, but I assume that there was no mention of which power was used when getting to this section. I vote for capitalization.</div><div class="cm tw">Section 170 has "If you have the Magical Power of Enchantment...". I don't quite see what you mean?</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect108.htm">108</a> #1: enchantment -> Enchantment <div class="cm tw">Is it the Power of Enchantment or enchantment in general?</div><div class="cm so">Errata</div><div class="cm jb">I'm not currently somewhere where I can view the graph to check, but I assume that there was no mention of which power was used when getting to this section. I vote for capitalization.</div><div class="cm tw">Section 170 has "If you have the Magical Power of Enchantment...". I don't quite see what you mean?</div><div class="cm jb">Enchantment</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect109">sect109</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect110">sect110</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect111">sect111</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect136">sect136</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect137">sect137</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect137.htm">137</a> #1: group of demons are rushing -> group of demons is rushing</div>
+<div class="e"><a href="sect137.htm">137</a> #2: Move the illustration to Section 139 where it actually fits the text of the section!<div class="cm so">Blimey! After checking up you're absolutely right. I'd second this.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect138">sect138</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect139">sect139</a></div>
+<div class="e"><a href="sect139.htm">139</a> #1: Move illustration 8 here, and give it the new caption "Your heart misses a beat as a huge pair of monstrous eyes appears within the flames of the portal."<div class="cm so">Blimey! After checking up you're absolutely right. I'd second this.</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect139.htm">139</a> #2: The horde stop -> The horde stops</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect140">sect140</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect141">sect141</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect141.htm">141</a> #1: large, reptilian -> large reptilian</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect165">sect165</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect165.htm">165</a> #1: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect166">sect166</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect166.htm">166</a> #1: clawed feet tells -> clawed feet tell<div class="cm tw">Wait - note that it says "The scratch and scuffle of clawed feet tells ...". I disagree, even though it's "scratch and scuffle".</div></div>
+<div class="re"><a href="sect166.htm">166</a> #1: clawed feet tells -> clawed feet tell<div class="cm tw">Wait - note that it says "The scratch and scuffle of clawed feet tells ...". I disagree, even though it's "scratch and scuffle".</div><div class="cm jb">Agreed, er... vetoed - the change that is. "tells"</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect167">sect167</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect168">sect168</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect169">sect169</a></div>
<div class="cn"><a href="sect169.htm">169</a> #1: WILLPDWER -> WILLPOWER</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect170">sect170</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect170.htm">170</a> #1: growling and howling of the pack draws -> growling and howling of the pack draw<div class="cm tw">Disagree, see 166 #1.</div></div>
+<div class="re"><a href="sect170.htm">170</a> #1: growling and howling of the pack draws -> growling and howling of the pack draw<div class="cm tw">Disagree, see 166 #1.</div><div class="cm jb">similarly vetoed. "draws"</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect170.htm">170</a> #2: demon horde are -> demon horde is</div>
<div class="re"><a href="sect170.htm">170</a> #3: half-way -> halfway<div class="cm tw">Duplicate.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect170.htm">170</a> #4: out-rider -> outrider <div class="cm ik">as twice in lw15</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect173">sect173</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect174">sect174</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect175">sect175</a></div>
-<div class="u"><a href="sect175.htm">175</a> #1: <div class="cm jb">This raises an interesting precedent. Could this be an alternative rule for negative WP scores?</div><div class="cm dd">I'd definately vote that we draw attention to it in the general Rules section where we discuss the possibility of "negative willpower". It still doesn't quite do away with the fact that the text in places has said "if your willpower has fallen to zero OR LESS" (am I remembering that correctly?) but it seems a good workable way to deal with the issue, and I think we'd do well to commend it to players as a rules suggestion.</div><div class="cm tw">I don't know if we should include it in the rules sections, but we could add footnotes in the places where you are told to use WP for a spell with no option to abstain. I don't think it's too many places actually; most are probably in the second half of 02tfc. Note that by only allowing it in these places, it is still possible to get negative WP when faced with Kleasas or Mother Magris.</div></div>
+<div class="u"><a href="sect175.htm">175</a> #1: <div class="cm jb">This raises an interesting precedent. Could this be an alternative rule for negative WP scores?</div><div class="cm dd">I'd definately vote that we draw attention to it in the general Rules section where we discuss the possibility of "negative willpower". It still doesn't quite do away with the fact that the text in places has said "if your willpower has fallen to zero OR LESS" (am I remembering that correctly?) but it seems a good workable way to deal with the issue, and I think we'd do well to commend it to players as a rules suggestion.</div><div class="cm tw">I don't know if we should include it in the rules sections, but we could add footnotes in the places where you are told to use WP for a spell with no option to abstain. I don't think it's too many places actually; most are probably in the second half of 02tfc. Note that by only allowing it in these places, it is still possible to get negative WP when faced with Kleasas or Mother Magris.</div><div class="cm jb">I seem to remember that Grey Star the Wizard had many such situations also. I lean toward one footnote in the rules. It might be kind to the reader to add a reminder footnote for each situation that we recognize, but with one footnote in the rules section, they have no excuse to be confused when it happens even if we neglect to put it in the section. We can do both if that helps everyone sleep better at night. *smile*</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect175.htm">175</a> #2: ie 2 -> i.e. 2</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect176">sect176</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect177">sect177</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect200.htm">200</a> #1: shuffling column reach -> shuffling column reaches</div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect200.htm">200</a> #2: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect201">sect201</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect201.htm">201</a> #1: shore', he says -> shore,' he says<div class="cm tw">This is already correct in the XML file?</div></div>
+<div class="e"><a href="sect201.htm">201</a> #1: shore', he says -> shore,' he says<div class="cm tw">This is already correct in the XML file?</div><div class="cm so">This is definitely Errata and still present. " 'I witnessed your struggle with the demons from the shore', he says."</div><div class="cm tw">Duh. Yes, sorry.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect201.htm">201</a> #2: great host of Masbaté warriors wait. -> great host of Masbaté warriors waits.</div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect201.htm">201</a> #3: wariors -> warriors</div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect201.htm">201</a> #4: you ashore. I am -> you ashore. 'I am <div class="cm tw">add to Errata!</div><div class="cm tw">Done!</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect214">sect214</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect215">sect215</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect216">sect216</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect216.htm">216</a> #1: pupiless -> pupilless (or pupil-less)<div class="cm jb">I think this is strange enough that I vote for "pupil-less".</div><div class="cm dd">Yuk! two hyphenated letter l's, I think that looks very ugly - I much prefer Ian Page's "pupiless"</div><div class="cm tw">Urgh, the Shadakine have eyes like female pupils? Any of the others, but not "pupiless"!</div><div class="cm ik">I just found a comparable example (in the Oxford Dictionary no less): "tailless" as in "a tailless cat". So I still opt for "pupilless" even though the Internet seems to favour "pupiless" with about 6:5.</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect216.htm">216</a> #1: pupiless -> pupilless (or pupil-less)<div class="cm jb">I think this is strange enough that I vote for "pupil-less".</div><div class="cm dd">Yuk! two hyphenated letter l's, I think that looks very ugly - I much prefer Ian Page's "pupiless"</div><div class="cm tw">Urgh, the Shadakine have eyes like female pupils? Any of the others, but not "pupiless"!</div><div class="cm ik">I just found a comparable example (in the Oxford Dictionary no less): "tailless" as in "a tailless cat". So I still opt for "pupilless" even though the Internet seems to favour "pupiless" with about 6:5.</div><div class="cm jb">OK, you've convinced me: "pupilless".</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect217">sect217</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect217.htm">217</a> #1: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="re"><a href="sect217.htm">217</a> #2: enchantment -> Enchantment <div class="cm tw">Is it the Power of Enchantment or enchantment in general?</div><div class="cm so">I think this is being used generally and should be left uncapitalised.</div><div class="cm jb">Agreed, "enchantment".</div><div class="cm dd">Yeah it's a generic use of enchantment.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect291.htm">291</a> #1: shield of sorcery -> Shield of Sorcery <div class="cm tw">And mark it as a <spell>. We did similarly in 02TFC.</div><div class="cm jb">Errata. Note issue 2 refers to this issue.</div><div class="cm tw">OK, removing issue 2.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect292">sect292</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect293">sect293</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect293.htm">293</a> #1: horde begin -> horde begins<div class="cm jb">This is debatable, but I don't think a horde can gloat as a group, therefore "begin". I know this ignores other instances of the same rule, but this is a subjective rule.</div><div class="cm tw">I really think "begins" sounds better here, but some other cases in this book: sect139 "The horde stop", sect174 "The horde falters", sect221 "The horde comes". I'd change 139.</div></div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect293.htm">293</a> #1: horde begin -> horde begins<div class="cm jb">This is debatable, but I don't think a horde can gloat as a group, therefore "begin". I know this ignores other instances of the same rule, but this is a subjective rule.</div><div class="cm tw">I really think "begins" sounds better here, but some other cases in this book: sect139 "The horde stop", sect174 "The horde falters", sect221 "The horde comes". I'd change 139.</div><div class="cm jb">OK, "begins" for this section, and please change 139.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect293.htm">293</a> #2: battle cry -> battle-cry <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect294">sect294</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect294.htm">294</a> #1: backpack -> Backpack<div class="cm so">Errata</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect296">sect296</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect297">sect297</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect298">sect298</a></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect298.htm">298</a> #1: over Tanith imperils -> over Tanith imperil<div class="cm tw">Disagree. I read "Mother Magri and her power over Tanith" as a unity. Is there a clear rule for this?</div><div class="cm dd">Absolutely - the original text is fine & correct.</div></div>
+<div class="re"><a href="sect298.htm">298</a> #1: over Tanith imperils -> over Tanith imperil<div class="cm tw">Disagree. I read "Mother Magri and her power over Tanith" as a unity. Is there a clear rule for this?</div><div class="cm dd">Absolutely - the original text is fine & correct.</div><div class="cm jb">I don't know that there's a clear rule for this one, but I would chalk it up to Mother Magri and her power acting as one.</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect298.htm">298</a> #2: magical powers -> Magical Powers <div class="cm tw">Does GS refer to the "game term" or...?</div><div class="cm so">I would leave this alone since it isn't referring to a specific Magical Power.</div><div class="cm jb">I vote to change it because it refers to Grey Star's powers which are the Magical Powers not generic magical powers.</div><div class="cm dd">yup</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect299">sect299</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect299.htm">299</a> #1: lies -> lie</div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect328">sect328</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect328.htm">328</a> #1: Shadkine -> Shadakine</div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect328.htm">328</a> #2: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
-<div class="f"><a href="sect328.htm">328</a> #3: The first choice seems to allow you to teleport without cost! Proposed footnote: "If you possess a Temeris Potion you can teleport without using any WILLPOWER points. If you are versed in the Higher Magick of Thaumaturgy you can teleport by deducting 2 WILLPOWER points from your total. To use the Dimension Door of the Moonstone to teleport, deduct 4 WILLPOWER points. (Cf. Section 12.)</div>
+<div class="cf"><a href="sect328.htm">328</a> #3: The first choice seems to allow you to teleport without cost! Proposed footnote: "If you possess a Temeris Potion you can teleport without using any WILLPOWER points. If you are versed in the Higher Magick of Thaumaturgy you can teleport by deducting 2 WILLPOWER points from your total. To use the Dimension Door of the Moonstone to teleport, deduct 4 WILLPOWER points. (Cf. Section 12.)<div class="cm jb">approved</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect329">sect329</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect330">sect330</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect331">sect331</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect353">sect353</a></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect353.htm">353</a> #1: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
<div class="ce"><a href="sect353.htm">353</a> #2: higher magick -> Higher Magick <div class="cm ik">as in the PAMoS</div></div>
-<div class="e"><a href="sect353.htm">353</a> #3: This section is missing a choice for what to do if you do not have any of the Magical Powers! However, 280 has one: "If you do not possess any of the above Powers, you must attack the bridge with your Staff; turn to 175."</div>
+<div class="ce"><a href="sect353.htm">353</a> #3: This section is missing a choice for what to do if you do not have any of the Magical Powers! However, 280 has one: "If you do not possess any of the above Powers, you must attack the bridge with your Staff; turn to 175."<div class="cm jb">Again, I'm good with adding this.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect354">sect354</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect355">sect355</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect356">sect356</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect358">sect358</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect359">sect359</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect360">sect360</a></div>
+<div class="e"><a href="sect360.htm">360</a> #1: 'The demon lord, Agarash -> 'The demon lord Agarash</div>
+<div class="e"><a href="sect360.htm">360</a> #2: Add a simple link to The Passing of the Shianti. <div class="cm tw">Shall the explanatory footnote be here or in 'Passing...'?</div><div class="cm tw">Link added, in the meantime.</div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect361">sect361</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect362">sect362</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect363">sect363</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect398">sect398</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect399">sect399</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="sect400">sect400</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill1">ill1</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill2">ill2</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill3">ill3</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill4">ill4</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill5">ill5</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill6">ill6</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill7">ill7</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill8">ill8</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill9">ill9</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill10">ill10</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill11">ill11</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill12">ill12</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill13">ill13</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill14">ill14</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill15">ill15</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill16">ill16</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill17">ill17</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill18">ill18</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill19">ill19</a></div>
-<div class="section"><a name="ill20">ill20</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="passing">passing</a></div>
-<div class="u"><a href="passing.htm">The Passing of the Shianti</a> #1: Wytch-Queen -> Wytch-queen <div class="cm ik">just like Wytch-king</div></div>
+<div class="cn"><a href="passing.htm">The Passing of the Shianti</a> #1: Wytch-Queen -> Wytch-queen <div class="cm ik">just like Wytch-king</div><div class="cm so">(Wytch-Queen -> Wytch-queen) This is Errata.</div><div class="cm jb">Approved. I think this can be considered "ne".</div></div></div>
<div class="section"><a name="map">map</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="action">action</a></div>
<div class="section"><a name="crsumary">crsumary</a></div>
</body>
</html>
+<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
+Local variables:
+mode: sgml
+sgml-omittag:t
+sgml-shorttag:t
+sgml-namecase-general:t
+sgml-general-insert-case:lower
+sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
+sgml-always-quote-attributes:t
+sgml-indent-step:1
+sgml-indent-data:t
+sgml-parent-document:nil
+sgml-exposed-tags:nil
+sgml-local-catalogs:nil
+sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
+End:
+-->
Project Aon Git Repositories / project-aon.git / commitdiff